The Lands Tribunal for Scotland has statutory power to deal with various types of dispute involving land or property. Although the Tribunal works in much the same way as an ordinary civil court, our aim is to be as accessible and user friendly as possible. This site provides a good deal of detail on all aspects of the work of the tribunal. Guidance is also available direct from the Tribunal Clerk and his staff.

One question you will need to ask yourself is whether professional representation is necessary. Some types of case are relatively straightforward, and beyond getting initial legal advice it may be possible for you to conduct the actual proceedings without further professional assistance. On the other hand, some cases involve technical areas of law and require careful legal and factual analysis. Should a case be presented unsuccessfully, there may well be an award of expenses made in favour of an opponent. So it is important to get advice in order to check that your case — or defence to a case — is well founded. Once you are satisfied that you have a sound case you can often take it through yourself. That is because procedure before the Tribunal is regulated by a series of orders telling parties what to do at each stage. In some cases special guidance letters will be sent out to help. You will also find on this site a “Guidance Note for Hearings”. This tells you all about the hearing stage. If any questions arise you can consider the “FAQs” or ask the clerks by phone or email.

In simple terms, court and tribunal procedure is aimed at getting a fair and independent decision on a disputed issue. Procedural rules boil down to the need to give proper written notice of what the real dispute is and to give a proper opportunity for the parties to present their own evidence and arguments and to comment on the opponent’s case.

Parties are usually entitled to have the evidence and submissions tested by a hearing in open court. However, many cases can be dealt with more simply if parties are able to agree that a full hearing is not needed. In other words, although there are some cases which are best presented with the assistance of lawyers and expert witnesses, there are others which are capable of being resolved more simply. You should not be reluctant to ask for the advice of Tribunal clerks about this.

As well as general comment and matters such as access to previous decisions of the Tribunal, you will find detailed information on this web site about

It is important to keep in mind the question of jurisdiction. Tribunals can only do what Parliament has authorised them to do. The Lands Tribunal for Scotland has statutory power only to deal with certain types of dispute. At the request of parties, it can also act as an arbiter to deal with any type of dispute. However, if there is no such agreement it can only hear cases covered by the statutes mentioned at Specific Statutory Jurisdictions.

In particular you should note that although our jurisdiction is related to land issues, most disputes about rights to land (for example, disputes over ownership or succession) are dealt with by the ordinary courts: the Sheriff Court or the Court of Session. The Scottish Land Court also has jurisdiction to deal with some land cases. This Court is sometimes confused with the Lands Tribunal. They share the same offices. But the work of the Court is quite distinct. The Land Court deals with cases involving agriculture and is mainly concerned in matters involving landlords and tenants.

The Lands Tribunal for Scotland
George House
126 George Street

DX ED 259
LP 14 Edinburgh 2

Tel:   0131 271 4350
Fax:   0131 271 4399
Email:   LTS_Mailbox [at] scotcourtstribunals [dot] gov [dot] uk

Death of Douglas James Gillespie FRICS

It is with great sadness that we intimate the death of tribunal member Douglas James Gillespie FRICS. Mr Gillespie (64) took up his appointment to the Lands Tribunal on 21 October 2013 and died on 17 February 2017. Paying tribute, Tribunal President Lord Minginish said “The death of Douglas robs the Tribunal of an outstanding talent and we as his colleagues, members and staff, mourn the loss of a friend. Douglas had so much to offer the Tribunal and it is a tragedy that we have been deprived of that contribution after less than four years. His formidable intellect as well as his wealth of experience, particularly in valuation for rating matters, earned him the respect not only of his colleagues but of tribunal users. He quite simply enhanced the reputation of the Tribunal in his all-too-brief time in office. We extend our deepest condolences to his wife Iris and his children Duncan, Rachel and Graeme.”